Amarjeet Sohi, Edmonton Ward 12 Councillor

Downtown arena district: framework approved

Nov
01
2011

I have received many emails and phone calls about this issue over the past few weeks. Please know that I have given each one consideration in coming to a decision. 

Utimately, I supported the negotiated framework for a new downtown arena district. Please allow me to explain why. 
 
The status quo 
This was a difficult decision with many factors involved. The first one is that, no matter what decision we had come to, City Council needed to act. Rexall Place no longer meets the needs of the Edmonton Oilers or its fans, according to current NHL standards. A 2007 report (commissioned by Northlands) told us that Rexall lacks restroom and food service capacity, concourses, and loading areas, among other things. The cost to bring Rexall to a modern facility would be about $200 million. As owner of the facility, the City—taxpayers, through their property taxes—would pay this bill. Over 20 years, we would pay $14 million per year to renovate Rexall. This would increase your property taxes by 1.4% each year for the next 20 years. In addition, we would continue to subsidize Rexall’s operations and maintenance. Currently, Edmonton taxpayers give about $5 million per year to Northlands for Rexall: $2 million for operations and $3 million for maintenance/upgrades.
 
Opportunity for multiple benefits
Can we provide a facility that meets everyone’s needs, get a better deal for taxpayers, keep the Oilers in Edmonton for the long term, and gain other benefits for the city? In particular, can we support the revitalization of downtown that is underway, creating a vibrant city core where more people will live, play, and do business? After months of research and many discussions with City Administration and with the constituents I represent, I truly believe the current framework does achieve these multiple benefits.
 
My number one concern, from the beginning, has always been that property taxes would not be increased to pay for a new arena. The day the Katz Group first presented their ideas to Council, I made a motion to ensure that any future deal would not increase your current property taxes. If an arena deal were to happen, money would have to come from somewhere else. 
 
Using some creative funding sources, the current deal does maintain this guarantee. Here are some key components of the framework:

1.  The City will own the arena building and land.

2. A Guaranteed Maximum Price for the downtown arena building of $450 million, including the construction of 350 parking stalls, is required. The City will not be responsible for any cost overruns and both parties have the right to walk away if the maximum price is not achieved.  The $450 million will be contributed from the following sources:

  • $100 million will come from the Katz Group, paid over 35 years (covering principle and interest) at about $5.5million/year. With interest (based on October 2011 rates), these annual payments would total about $192 million at the end of the 35-year period.  
  • $125 million will come from facility users through a 7% ticket surcharge at the new Downtown Arena building. 
  • $125 million will come from the City:  $45 million being directed from the planned Community Revitalization Levy (CRL).  A CRL can be created to help fund a major project like an arena. The City sets a boundary that includes the new project and the area surrounding it, where growth will happen as a result of the project. The City calculates how much property tax this CRL area generated before the new project gets built, and continues to take this much tax to fund services. However, as tax revenues from the area increase over the years, the amount from new growth only is used to pay off the cost of the catalyst project (arena), without which the development would not be occurring in the first place. In other words, a CRL is not an additional tax on existing downtown residents and businesses. The City also gets to keep the education portion of these new taxes, which would typically go to the Province. Development in the Downtown Community Revitalization Levy boundary approved by Council is expected to generate $1.18 billion of new tax revenue over its 20-year term. This creative funding method is one way the City will be able to fund a new arena without increasing the property taxes Edmontonians currently pay. Because the lands around Rexall Place do not have the same potential for new growth, a CRL would not be viable if a facility were to be built or renovated there. $80 million coming partly from a redirection of a subsidy paid to the current Rexall Place.
  • $100 million will be requested from other orders of government.  Construction of the facility will not proceed without this funding.

3.  The Edmonton Oilers Hockey Club will sign a Location Agreement to stay in Edmonton for 35 years.

4.  The Katz Group will commit $100 million to associated adjacent investment, with at least $30 million coming prior to construction of the arena, and the balance invested subject to commercial viability. 

5.  The City’s costs to build an LRT connection to the arena will be capped at $17 million. 

6.  The City will pay half the cost of a pedway across 104 avenue, up to a maximum of $25 million for the City’s share.

7.  The City will enter into a marketing partnership with the Edmonton Oilers at $2 million a year for 10 years. The funds will be used to promote the image of the City nationally and internationally. This marketing plan will be reviewed every two years. 

8.  The Katz Group is to operate the new arena and is to pay all operating expenses, capital maintenance and repair. The Katz Group will receive all revenue from the arena, including naming rights. 

9.  From a taxpayer’s perspective, this is a better deal for the City than most NHL franchises have negotiated. The deal most NHL teams have with their cities is that the team gets all operating revenues from events and pays for operations—but not things like building maintenance and repair, or major upgrades. Edmonton is getting a better deal: the Katz Group will be responsible for all of these costs. So once the City has contributed its portion for construction and surrounding infrastructure, we will not be liable for any further costs. Under our existing deal for Rexall Place, we are liable for major repair and renovation costs on an aging facility.  In order to make the arena a revenue-generating enterprise over the long term, the Katz Group will need to market the City and arena effectively and attract major events of various kinds. These events will draw many people, hockey-lovers and others, to our downtown core, to well-located lands that are currently under-used.  

10.  A supplementary surcharge will be added to tickets at Rexall Place to maintain a level playing field between the two facilities. The money collected from the Northlands Facility Fee will not go towards the new arena.

11.  The City has committed $30 million for design work to be completed to 60% design at which point obtaining a Guaranteed Maximum Price is feasible.

12.  The City has purchased the land necessary to proceed with development of a downtown arena and infrastructure around 104 Avenue. The City’s net cost will ultimately be around $25 million. This is consistent with Council’s direction. 

13.  The City will have access to the arena facility for up to 4 weeks each year. The City is free to take advantage of the facility for community events during this period, and will retain all revenues and pay operating costs for these days. 

14.  A community benefits agreement will be made between the Katz Group and the City. This agreement has not been finalized, but could include activities such as: mini-hockey camps, tickets and events for under-privileged youth and families, and access to skating in the arena for residents. 

 
Moving forward
The arena is not a done deal. Though Council has approved a framework, we will still need to approve a borrowing bylaw (to borrow money for arena costs), a master agreement between the City and Katz Group, and a design concept. If some factor changes such that a new arena will no longer be a good deal for Edmontonians, we have the ability not to move ahead. 
 
Thank you for allowing me to explain why I supported the deal we ultimately reached. I take very seriously the responsibility of representing my constituents to City Council, and I want you to know that I have made this decision because I sincerely believe it will be good for our city over the long term. 

Comments about "Downtown arena district: framework approved"

Review entry | Have your say

I'm interested in hearing your thoughts on this matter. Be the first to comment!

Posted by Amarjeet (at time of entry).

 

Have your say

Review entry | Review comments

Comments are moderated for civility. Fields marked with * are required before the moderator can approve the comments.

* Your name:

* Your email address:

Location:

* Your comments:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


Privacy Policy: We respect your privacy. We will not forward your personal information to any other organization except as required by law, and will use your e-mail address only to respond to your comments. We reserve the right to edit and remove comments for length, clarity and/or if they are illegal or inappropriate. Your email address is never shown to visitors to sohi.ca.